The Blackstang/Little Homer Ass Whooper is Finished !!!!!

baldy said:
What does it matter if it was a glide or a 400?
Click to expand...
So there's no difference between a th400 and a glide? I can think of one obvious one but I'll let you work on it. Maybe even do some simple multiplication and get back with me.
baldy said:
Seems to me his old shit with one system went faster than your twin turbo!!!
Click to expand...
Actually it didn't go faster. I went 161 as well. But if you mean quicker, he did go one tenth quicker with bigger tires, wheelie bars, lighter car, better motor, etc. That's not saying very much to go 1 tenth faster with all those things working for you does it? How about when you throw in the fact that my passes were with a stock crank/block/head/cube ls1 on et streets at 3450 lbs while getting out of the throttle four times during the pass and riding the rev limiter the last second of it. Do you want to continue?
 
The point is captain keyboard you had two power adders to one and his car was still faster!!!! Now go figure that one out....
 
baldy said:
The point is captain keyboard you had two power adders to one and his car was still faster!!!! Now go figure that one out....
Click to expand...
My buddy's top sportsman car goes 7.8's on the motor with no power-adders. Does that mean wheelerz car and every other car with an adder on here is a piece of junk because it went a second slower with an adder? Or maybe the details of the combo do play a little part in the equation like he runs at 2600 lbs, has 16 inch wide tires, 4-link, etc. You are not making very much sense.

BTW, twin-turbos count as one power adder in all or most all racing orgs so you don't even have that much right.

I don't understand the captain keyboard part either. I had my junk out all over the place last year and my next one will be all over when it's done as well. I've never seen you race though? Funny how that works isn't it???
 
baldy said:
There you go with your buddys car shit again, you just dont get it.. so nevermind.
Click to expand...
So you bring up wheelerz car as an example and I bring another car as an example but then you say this? lol beautiful!

I guess you can't argue my point so you just ignore it altogether.
 
LTLHOMER said:
So there's no difference between a th400 and a glide? I can think of one obvious one but I'll let you work on it. Maybe even do some simple multiplication and get back with me.

Actually it didn't go faster. I went 161 as well. But if you mean quicker, he did go one tenth quicker with bigger tires, wheelie bars, lighter car, better motor, etc. That's not saying very much to go 1 tenth faster with all those things working for you does it? How about when you throw in the fact that my passes were with a stock crank/block/head/cube ls1 on et streets at 3450 lbs while getting out of the throttle four times during the pass and riding the rev limiter the last second of it. Do you want to continue?
Click to expand...

my car would have went faster with a 400. i dont know about better parts, you had 2 turbos, big stuff 3, data loggers, and so on. i had a 395, one carb, one foger, old school highports on a 28x10 tire at 3100 pounds. you had way more money in your car then mine. so yep i want you to continue. dont get me into this, my car was way faster then yours with way less in my opinion. Ls1 matt went almost as fast with stock cylinder heads, you had 2 fuckin turbos. good for you that you went 161, most anything with 2 turbos on it should
 
wheelz357 said:
my car would have went faster with a 400. i dont know about better parts, you had 2 turbos, big stuff 3, data loggers, and so on. i had a 395, one carb, one foger, old school highports on a 28x10 tire at 3100 pounds. you had way more money in your car then mine. so yep i want you to continue. dont get me into this, my car was way faster then yours with way less in my opinion. Ls1 matt went almost as fast with stock cylinder heads, you had 2 fuckin turbos. good for you that you went 161, most anything with 2 turbos on it should
Click to expand...
lol that's an interesting opinion. Who knew a guy with pretty much a super street car would be bragging to a guy with an actual street car with a bunch of stock junk and some boost and then tell him he had more money into his setup.

Can't say I am not flattered by the comparison though. If it's so easy to go fast with turbos, why do you stick with nitrous?

LS1matt went 15+ mph slower with LS6 style heads while I ran 241 castings aka actual heads that came on an fbody. Not knocking that at all but you are trying to say he went almost as fast which just isn't true. And if it were true, he ALMOST went as fast as you then too. Doh!
 
wheelz357 said:
maybe not in a class, but if you look at a car that has two turbos feeding an engine, that is 2 power adders.
Click to expand...
Sorry but I'd have to side with the organizations over some dude on the internet who can't hang with turbo cars so he has to come up with excuses as to why not.

I'll be back to argue some more in a few hours.
 
LTLHOMER said:
lol that's an interesting opinion. Who knew a guy with pretty much a super street car would be bragging to a guy with an actual street car with a bunch of stock junk and some boost and then tell him he had more money into his setup.

Can't say I am not flattered by the comparison though. If it's so easy to go fast with turbos, why do you stick with nitrous?

LS1matt went 15+ mph slower with LS6 style heads while I ran 241 castings aka actual heads that came on an fbody. Not knocking that at all but you are trying to say he went almost as fast which just isn't true. And if it were true, he ALMOST went as fast as you then too. Doh!
Click to expand...

super street car, cool, im better then i think. i stick with nitrous for just that reason. its cheaper, i dont have your money i guess. I dont need bigstuff 3, dataloggers or any of the high dollar shit that you had. Your motor might not have had a lot of money it it, like you say, but all the other stuff cost more then what i had. nitrous is what i know. your 241 castings flow about as much air as my high ports did. i went faster then you with one system to your 2 turbos is all im saying. If i would have used the second kit to your two turbos, it wouldnt even be close. nitrous is way cheaper, thats a fact, thats why i know i had way less in mine is all i am saying
 
outlawss said:
were talking a huge difference in cost between a nitrous and turbo car......
Click to expand...

thats what im saying. cost of 2 turbos, big stuff, all the plumbing and intercoolers and fuel system to support it all, i can build a nitrous motor. thats why i can do turbos
 
johnquick302 said:
ok then well bring dominic into this. stock 4.6 4v shit with a single turbo, 3400lbs, aod, 8.50s at 161mph...
Click to expand...

thats also my point. 281 cubes, one turbo, way faster then homers 350 inch and 2 turbos. Im sure some willl think im wrong, but my old car was faster with less in my opinion. The guy who owns my old motor went 8.40 at 3200 on radials with both systems. thats a closer comparison because my car was a ladder bar, but was still 28x10 tire
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top