10 year old, 580hp, AWD Murcielago traps faster and has a higher top speed than ZL1. Oh, and it's not a Camaro. :lol:Reality, and facts beg to differ with your post. Here is a list of all the Lambo's that had slower ring times. I am sure they all cost less and go slower in the 1/4 mile, so by your criteria all is right in the world.
7:41.27 Camaro ZL1 (2012) GM test driver Aaron Link October 2011 GM conducted test (10/2011)
7:42 Lamborghini Murciélago LP670-4 SV Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (01/2010?)
7:46 Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (09/2007)[43]
7:47 Lamborghini Murciélago LP640 E-gear Horst von Saurma Sport Auto (01/2007), Sport tires
So what was that about a brick competing with a wedge? Maybe Lamborghini should do what Ferrari has done and buy magnetic shock technology from GM, then all the little wedges could keep up.
-Geoff
If you want to compare 2012 models. . . well, here's a little video for you:
After seeing how 500whp Camaro's couldn't keep up with my GenII Viper ACR with muffler & cat deletes. The ZL1 does not even come up on my radar as a car to watch out for. But if anyone with a ZL1 wants to see what will happen against a 600bhp, RWD Lambo. I'm down.
Nick
Last edited: