2014 Ram 1500 Offers Best-in-class Fuel Efficiency with Industry’s Only Light-duty Diesel Pickup

Especially since diesel is still sitting near $4 per gallon, and gasoline is approaching $3.

-Geoff

Dunno. A friend of mine and I hauled the same basic setup (b-bodies on open tandem axle trailers) to GA a few weeks ago. His 2010 2500HD with a gas 6.0 compared to my 02 2500HD with the DMax. Even with the cost differential in fuel, I was averaging $0.09-0.11 per mile better than him. It wasa good 1600 mile experiment. That was with 5500# total trailer weight, I am not sure where it would end up if we were towing closer to 12k. I was pretty happy with 14-15 mpg towing at 5500#.

Put the same scenario with more "right sized" light duty diesels and a $2800 option might have a chance of paying for itself in fuel savings. Time will tell.

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
 
I just leased a outdoorsman ram ($46,xxx msrp) hemi, 8 speed, heated seats/steering wheel, premium sound, sunroof, ramboxes

for $219.45 a month $500 down 15,000 miles a year (2 yr lease)
 
I have asked the question "Where is Ford's light-duty diesel?" of some people who would know that answer.
According to them, the business case is not there long-term. As emissions standards tighten over the next few years, that business case will not improve.
VM makes this class of diesel for distribution world-wide. The one in the Dodge will obviously have the best of tech, but I would suspect they amortize the tooling across several lower-tech (and lower-cost) models being sold in countries where emissions are not an issue. Yet. Even the Middle East and Africa are under pressure to curb CO2. While I am sure several of these 3.0 VM powered Dodges will be tested in every way imaginable and torn down to nuts and bolts over the next few months. Ford and GM will find out how they are making the numbers work.
Or not.

The Dodges ARE really nice! I will admit they have caught up to the Ford. No real surprise there, since they have been hiring away Ford engineers for several years! The entire industry, and the non-commercial truck market in particular, are in for MAJOR changes over the next 10 years. The days of people buying a truck capable of towing 10K so they can haul a few flats of petunias home for the wife will go away. THAT business case, like that of supplying a $40K truck for $300 a month will go the way of $2.00 gas. There is no way on earth that Chrysler can be making money on that truck. It's not sustainable. Someone else mentioned that's why they went from Chrysler, to Daimler, to Cerberus, to Chrysler, to bankrupt, to Fiat. Pushing these sweet lease deals is down that same old path.
 
Last edited:
yeah I have seen the new Titan with the diesel, its pretty agressive design and power for a light duty truck.
However I think it will be priced quite high so it might be an "in between" from light duty and the real heavy duty trucks.

I do think this is a great option for chrysler and I hope the other manufacturers follow suit as well.
$2800 option is pretty tough but the motor is a 250K motor. Now how the TRANNY will survive is the big question.

-AJ

Huge risk for Nissan in my opinion. I could see an established truck builder like Ford pulling this off and filling a niche, but Nissan? An in-betweener like this? Takes some cojones, and not so sure it's gonna work. If it does, a name with cache like "Cummins" will be why.
 
Back
Top