Got'r Done!

Gold Rush said:
366 stock bottom end vs. i beleive its a 38x ci, thats a little more than 1 ci.

366ci huh? :dontknow: I thought ls1' were 346. Trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
 
trigger said:
366ci huh? :dontknow: I thought ls1' were 346. Trying to pull the wool over my eyes.

its a ls2 stock bottom end ls1 ls2, its all the same mumbo jumbo..a few more cubes, still garbage, i wish i had more money to do it right.
 
Last edited:
1BADAIR said:
my heads flow 275cfm at .600
what about yours?

I really believe you, mine are ls6 HAND PORT with a 5 angle valve job, so you do that math. Why all the excuses? less cubes vs. more cubes..i know cubes dont mean much but my car hasnt even been down the 1/4 mile yet.
 
Gold Rush said:
I really believe you, mine are ls6 HAND PORT with a 5 angle valve job, so you do that math. Why all the excuses? less cubes vs. more cubes..i know cubes dont mean much but my car hasnt even been down the 1/4 mile yet.

ask SEAN
I asked for one of his special grinds. when I sent him my flow sheets he thought I was joking.
He said you don't need a new cam. you need new heads
 
Any chance of you snapping a few non cell phone pics for us? rear wheels/tires look badass. I would like to see a couple better quality shots.
 
trigger said:
Any chance of you snapping a few non cell phone pics for us? rear wheels/tires look badass. I would like to see a couple better quality shots.

Sure can tonight ill have them posted..the car is in my garage now.
 
trigger said:
Sweet! What are you going to do for front runners on this car?

I wanted to run the alumastars but im sure they would bend the way im going to drive it so i guess i just might get the match to the rears. But in the meantime im not too worried about it.
 
Back
Top