Wear your helmets out on the bikes, please =-['

DetroitStyle said:
What do you think the fatalities are from? Because I'd bet a lot of money that the majority of them are due to head trauma. Nobody's dying because they broke their collarbone...

but if you want to be a turd and argue justs to argue... there's plenty of evidence to support what anybody with common sense understands already

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN13Q5NS

b112daa5ac47ee04e8d3c023b62d0814.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

If you don't want me to argue, quit putting up bullshit facts that don't mean anything. Like the 26% increase you quoted in your post. That is literally meaningless. Show me how it ties to helmet laws other than the dates. And what about the years in between? It seems to me like cherrypicked data. You might as well be Wide Winger posting his conspiracy theories.
 
DetroitStyle said:
Ask the anti-helmet crowd to go step out onto the football field and play some wide receiver for a full season. No helmet. Surely it's safer because you can see and hear the defenders better, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Turns out the helmet really doesn't stop you from getting a concussion though, does it.

-Geoff
 
WhiteHawk said:
If you don't want me to argue, quit putting up bullshit facts that don't mean anything. Like the 26% increase you quoted in your post. That is literally meaningless. Show me how it ties to helmet laws other than the dates. And what about the years in between? It seems to me like cherrypicked data. You might as well be Wide Winger posting his conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

So, wearing a helmet is safer is a conspiracy theory. Got it. You seem sane.
 
DetroitStyle said:
So, wearing a helmet is safer is a conspiracy theory. Got it. You seem sane.
Click to expand...

I am going to type this extra slow so you have a chance of understanding what I am saying. The funny thing is, I don't disagree with your conclusion, just the facts you use to support it. But continue with your straw man argument because you obviously don't understand the math behind what you are typing. So post some more worthless statistics, please!

The statement below, from your post, is bullshit. The 26% is meaningless, cherry-picked, nonsense. That is all I am saying. It means nothing other than the mathematical result of dividing two numbers. It does nothing to prove helmets are safe or unsafe. It only shows more people died, but that is all. It doesn't support the helmet law either way. But that is the media nowadays. They cherry-pick what they need to support their conclusion. And the dumb masses fall for it. Like you did.

Motorcycle fatalities are up 26% overall since they repealed the helmet law.
Click to expand...

-Geoff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top