Remember that cop that was driving drunk and hit three motorcyclists... killing one

DetroitStyle

Club Member
The prosecuter has decided to drop the drunk driving charges because the blood draw wasn't done correctly!

Still think cops aren't crooked??!?!?

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/24686898/detail.html

INDIANAPOLIS -- Alcohol-related charges against an Indianapolis police officer who was accused of drunken driving in a fatal crash will be dropped after a judge ruled that proper procedures weren't followed in the investigation.

Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi said Thursday afternoon that in light of Judge Grant Hawkins' ruling, four counts of operating while under the influence, causing serious injury and one charge of operating while under the influence, causing death, will be dropped against Officer David Bisard. A reckless homicide and criminal recklessness charge will remain.

Hawkins ruling meant specifically that Bisard, a nine-year veteran of the department, will keep his driver's license.

Bisard was on duty when he plowed into a group of motorcyclists stopped at a red light Aug. 6, killing Eric Wells, 30, and injuring Kurt Weekly, 44, and Mary Mills, 47.

Brizzi said he decided to drop charges because the blood draw was improperly taken and will not be admissible.

"It wasn't conducted at a hospital, as it's defined under the statute, and it wasn't performed by someone who has the legal requirements necessary," he said, adding that a lab tech at a clinic performed the draw.

Brizzi said authorities aren't questioning the results of the blood draw, which showed Bisard registered a blood-alcohol level of 0.19 two hours after the crash, just the way it was obtained.

Brizzi also blasted the quality of the police investigation, saying that someone at the scene should have recognized the officer's impairment and should have followed up to ensure procedures were properly followed.

"I am questioning their work at the scene. Every other person who we charge with operating a vehicle while intoxicated, we have probable cause affidavits," Brizzi said. "Officers are able to detect the odor of alcoholic beverages from several feet away, identify slurred speech, identify glassy eyes. I am frustrated, because there is an appearance … that something was amiss … and I'm not going to sugar coat it."

Brizzi went so far as to question the truthfulness of officers at the scene who said they didn't know Bisard was drunk, but wouldn't speculate about whether there was a cover-up.

Ryan Wells, whose brother was killed in the crash, said he believes fellow police officers lied on Bisard's behalf.
 
Last edited:
All I can do is :lol: at this.

Pretty soon we'll have people posting that he was just DOING HIS JOB! :roll:
 
Seems like it's just like any other boys club where a wink at the right person will save your ass. Most of congress should be in jail or worse but they have their club card so they get away with shit. It's sad, truly.
 
because there is an appearance … that something was amiss … and I'm not going to sugar coat it.

No, I don't think that was the allegation at all. I think, very directly, that it's suspected that his fellow officers purposely tainted the evidence collection process so it would be deemed inadmissible.

Police officers are trained to spot drunks and know how to collect evidence as such.

I can understand trying to hook up your friends or handle things internally .. Like when our county executive got popped for DUI on his way home from a golf course and the cop drove him home instead of taking him to jail.

In that example no one had really been hurt. Sure justice suffered a little bit, but no big whoop. In this case someone was killed.

It would have been nice had the reporter asked whoever is in charge of that police department what repercussions there will be for the officers who screwed up the evidence collection.

Will they be fired? Will they be disciplined in some meaningful way? Will they be charged with obstructing justice?
 
My post only was ment to say "wow gee two assholes" one was in a cop car one was on a motorcycle. Both stories have essentially the same discussion going on two different message boards but from opposite sides of the fence.
 
My post only was ment to say "wow gee two assholes" one was in a cop car one was on a motorcycle. Both stories have essentially the same discussion going on two different message boards but from opposite sides of the fence.

The two stories are nothing alike.

1. In the Indy story, a drunk driving cop was responding to a call and hit three complete uninvolved motorcyclists who were stopped on the road, killing one, injuring two more. And the cops are dropping half of the charges because of cop coverup BS

2. In the story you posted, I'm calling complete BS. Anybody who has run, knows somebody who's run, or knows anything about it... knows that fleeing motorists/cyclists would NEVER stop and return to the scene just to laugh at the cop. You keep going until you are LONG GONE. What, they figured that the cop doesn't have a radio? They somehow knew that there were no other cars coming to assist in the chase? That the helicopter wasn't up and looking for them? In all likelihood, the cop crashed, was upset, and made up the "They came back to laugh at me" part of the story.
 
ok cops = always wrong. Bikers = always right. I understand now.
I don't see how the drunks choice of job figures so prominetly into any of this, did you know one of the bikers or is this just a cops suck thread?
if the blood draw was bad it's bad. If you think the dead guys civil rights were voloated call the feds. it's a non story as far as I'm concerned. (acually they both were I don't have a dog in either show)
 
ok cops = always wrong. Bikers = always right. I understand now.
I don't see how the drunks choice of job figures so prominetly into any of this, did you know one of the bikers or is this just a cops suck thread?
if the blood draw was bad it's bad. If you think the dead guys civil rights were voloated call the feds. it's a non story as far as I'm concerned. (acually they both were I don't have a dog in either show)

The point of it is that's it's more and more typical of cop's behavior that the rules don't apply to them. When they do something wrong, they cover it up, blame/frame innocent people, etc. These cops initially tried to blame the accident on the bikers because they didn't yeild to the officer's lights/sirens (they had nowhere to go).

Just like the Detroit cops who initially tried to blame the grandmother of that 7 year old girl who was killed during a raid. They all banded together and lied and said the grandma tackled the cop and his gun went off. Then it comes out that there is video and the shot was actually fired from outside of the house. A gang of cops, instantly banded together and LIED and tried to blame grandma for KILLING a 7 year old girl.

Or the assistant chief of police in Marysville who's been caught ON TAPE, saying that he will make up charges against two guys who were legally open carrying guns. Why is that guy still on the job? He's ON TAPE, saying that he will MAKE UP charges on innocent people?

If this was just any other drunk on the road, or you, or me... who hit the bikers, we'd be in jail, facing MASSIVE charges. But because it was a cop, they are trying their best to cover it up and let the guy skate as lightly as possible.

I don't know these bikers.
 
Last edited:
The point of it is that's it's more and more typical of cop's behavior that the rules don't apply to them. When they do something wrong, they cover it up, blame/frame innocent people, etc. These cops initially tried to blame the accident on the bikers because they didn't yeild to the officer's lights/sirens (they had nowhere to go).

Just like the Detroit cops who initially tried to blame the grandmother of that 7 year old girl who was killed during a raid. They all banded together and lied and said the grandma tackled the cop and his gun went off. Then it comes out that there is video and the shot was actually fired from outside of the house. A gang of cops, instantly banded together and LIED and tried to blame grandma for KILLING a 7 year old girl.

Or the assistant chief of police in Marysville who's been caught ON TAPE, saying that he will make up charges against two guys who were legally open carrying guns. Why is that guy still on the job? He's ON TAPE, saying that he will MAKE UP charges on innocent people?

If this was just any other drunk on the road, or you, or me... who hit the bikers, we'd be in jail, facing MASSIVE charges. But because it was a cop, they are trying their best to cover it up and let the guy skate as lightly as possible.

I don't know these bikers.

So...You know of three crooked cops. That makes them all bad? I say this because you constantly post up this stuff. Do you really think that this is the norm for the police? I'm not defending the bad ones. In fact they need to have their asses handed to them, but the reality is they are the very small minority of cops. If you hate cops so much because of personnal exxperience, you may need to take a honest look at the situation. If you seem to get hassled a lot, maybe the problem is you, not them? Just sayin.
 
Back
Top