Question for the cops and lawyers here...

There is also a sign that says you MUST turn left from the inside lane, as shown below. So there's no need to signal.
So if you are in a right turn lane you don't need to signal?? Not arguing, just curious if that is a fact? NOT using a turn signal is a HUGE pet peeve of mine and it seems like anymore if you DO signal, someone will try and fuck you out of what you are trying to do...even a simple lane change.
 
So if you are in a right turn lane you don't need to signal?? Not arguing, just curious if that is a fact? NOT using a turn signal is a HUGE pet peeve of mine and it seems like anymore if you DO signal, someone will try and fuck you out of what you are trying to do...even a simple lane change.

I would say you definitely need to signal from the outside lane, because you have the option of either turning left or going straight.... but from the inside lane, the sign and the paint on the road says you must turn left, therefor you've "signalled" your intentions the moment you entered that lane. At least, that's what my argument would be.
 
and yes, I hate people who don't signal. And yes, I see people all the time who try to close up space/not let you in when you DO try to be polite and signal. If there is space, and I signal, and I see somebody speed up... I just come on over anyway. Fuck 'em.
 
court is in plymouth
ask city atny. to pleade to impeading traffic so the township gets the money
have a nice day thank you for supporting the canton police
 
Call them up telling them about 90%the of the D-Bags that whip outta the dunkin donuts stuffin there face with an eclaire and chugging a shake while slowly cutting across 3 lanes to then decide that the far right lane was where they wanted to be. When u blow your horn at them they wanna cuss u out and flip up there sausage like finger at you for correcting the D-Bag. /Rant
 
I would say you definitely need to signal from the outside lane, because you have the option of either turning left or going straight.... but from the inside lane, the sign and the paint on the road says you must turn left, therefor you've "signalled" your intentions the moment you entered that lane. At least, that's what my argument would be.

I think QWKSLVR meant if you're in a turn right only lane. It would make sense that you shouldn't need to signal. I always do out of habit though.

I hate stupid tickets like this. There's so much other shit going on in these city's that this does not need to happen..
 
I think QWKSLVR meant if you're in a turn right only lane. It would make sense that you shouldn't need to signal. I always do out of habit though.

I hate stupid tickets like this. There's so much other shit going on in these city's that this does not need to happen..

ohh, yeah, I missed that. I would say that if you signaled to enter the right turn lane, that SHOULD cover it on common sense. I mean, you're in a right turn only lane, there's nowhere else for you to go. Whether the courts and cops have common sense like that....well?
 
ohh, yeah, I missed that. I would say that if you signaled to enter the right turn lane, that SHOULD cover it on common sense. I mean, you're in a right turn only lane, there's nowhere else for you to go. Whether the courts and cops have common sense like that....well?

:roll: Common sense is few and far between anymore...
 
Act 300 of 1949


257.648 Signals for stopping or turning; violation as civil infraction.

Sec. 648.

(1) The driver of a vehicle or bicycle upon a highway, before stopping or turning from a direct line, shall first see that the stopping or turning can be made in safety and shall give a signal as required in this section.

(2) A signal required in this section shall be given either by means of the hand and arm in the manner specified in this section, or by a mechanical or electrical signal device which conveys an intelligible signal or warning to other highway traffic, except as otherwise provided in subsection (3). When a signal is given by means of the hand and arm, the driver shall indicate his or her intention to stop or turn by extending his hand and arm from and beyond the left side of the vehicle and signal as follows:

(a) Left turn ..... hand and arm extended horizontally.

(b) Right turn ..... hand and arm extended upward.

(c) Stop or decrease speed ..... hand and arm extended downward.

(3) A commercial motor vehicle, other than those in transit from a manufacturer to a dealer, in use on a highway shall be equipped with, and required signal shall be given by, a signal lamp or mechanical signal device when the distance from the center of the top of the steering post to the left outside limit of the body, cab, or load of the commercial motor vehicle exceeds 24 inches, or when the distance from the center of the top of the steering post to the rear limit of the body or load of the commercial vehicle exceeds 14 feet. The measurement from steering post to rear limit shall apply to a single vehicle or combination of vehicles.

(4) A person who violates this section is responsible for a civil infraction.


History: 1949, Act 300, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949 ;-- Am. 1954, Act 181, Eff. Aug. 13, 1954 ;-- Am. 1958, Act 166, Eff. Sept. 13, 1958 ;-- Am. 1974, Act 334, Imd. Eff. Dec. 17, 1974 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 510, Eff. Aug. 1, 1979

did you turn from a direct line of travel?
 
I was just there earlier today... I always hit my left turn signal as soon as the right one goes off and leave it on throughout the turnaround, never had a problem, even in that turn around.
 
Update : went to court today. I was told to be there at 8:15 and was there by 8:00 . Waited two and a half hours to see the prosecutor !! He asked my story and said " Yeah, im not sure if you violated the turn signal law. I can give you zero points and a fine of 155. " I asked if nobody was sure of the law, why would i pay 155 ? He then says " well, you can fight it. "
Ok , i say and i go into the court room.
At 11:05, i get to go in front of the judge. He says" you wont be testifying, you have to set up a formal hearing. Go downstairs to the cashier and set up a date. "
My file doesnt arrive downstairs until 11:30 . 3.5 hours WASTED and i still have to go back to court.
FML.

Next week im going to take video of the 250+ cars that get out of my school and make the turn there. If i did violate the law, canton could write hundreds of tickets at 2:00 pm and 10:00 pm.
 
Last edited:
Update : went to court today. I was told to be there at 8:15 and was there by 8:00 . Waited two and a half hours to see the prosecutor !! He asked my story and said " Yeah, im not sure if you violated the turn signal law. I can give you zero points and a fine of 155. " I asked if nobody was sure of the law, why would i pay 155 ? He then says " well, you can fight it. "
Ok , i say and i go into the court room.
At 11:05, i get to go in front of the judge. He says" you wont be testifying, you have to set up a formal hearing. Go downstairs to the cashier and set up a date. "
My file doesnt arrive downstairs until 11:30 . 3.5 hours WASTED and i still have to go back to court.
FML.

Next week im going to take video of the 250+ cars that get out of my school and make the turn there. If i did violate the law, canton could write hundreds of tickets at 2:00 pm and 10:00 pm.

Why would you want to screw everyone else because you got caught?
 
Why would you want to screw everyone else because you got caught?

Not trying to screw anybody, come on. I want to show that the turn i made is normal and accepted at that intersection. I want to show that the police do not enforce this and this officer wrote an excessive ticket for nothing.
 
I would of glady settled with the fine no points. The judge cam say piss off pay the primal fine and have the points to. Sat in formal traffic court a few times lol and watched as more and more ppl went up to their hearing he got less and less forgiving. He got pissed cause there were so many driving on suspended that he was angry as hell about it an ppl with cleaner records got more shit as the day went on just because it put him in a pissed off mood. Lol Good luck to you tho
 
I would of glady settled with the fine no points. The judge cam say piss off pay the primal fine and have the points to. Sat in formal traffic court a few times lol and watched as more and more ppl went up to their hearing he got less and less forgiving. He got pissed cause there were so many driving on suspended that he was angry as hell about it an ppl with cleaner records got more shit as the day went on just because it put him in a pissed off mood. Lol Good luck to you tho

So you like to take it in the ass ? I dont.
He wrote a bad ticket. It may be zero points , but its still on your record. Insurance companys can see it and so can cops and judges.
 
Yea because that is now 2 days off of work u have to take so either way u lost money and or possible sick/vacation days. So either way you lost and achieved nothing. Go back to drivers training anytime u switch lanes u must use your turn signal. You broke the law you got caught. Like I said GL at court if I was in your situation Id feel like inwas pressing my luck. GL
 
Yea because that is now 2 days off of work u have to take so either way u lost money and or possible sick/vacation days. So either way you lost and achieved nothing. Go back to drivers training anytime u switch lanes u must use your turn signal. You broke the law you got caught. Like I said GL at court if I was in your situation Id feel like inwas pressing my luck. GL
x2
 
Back
Top