I have to admit, I am always fascinated by law (should have studied law) ....
I may have it wrong, but from what I understood was there was a secure loan, and as additional collateral/security for the loan the lot next door was put up as part of the agreement.
The loan is in default, and today the Judge approved receivership (allowing till April 9th for filing any protests) to allow a third party to sell all property and assets for as much money as they can get (including the lot next door- there was a protest over the lot next door, interested parties said there was enough equity in the dragway property to cover the loan amount-Judge dismissed that claim and both lots are to be sold.
In my head, if you made a secure loan to someone on property and they defaulted, you would get the property..... but here they are selling the property and paying off the loan with the monies from the sale, then it looks like they get to keep whats left over after all fees/court costs are paid. At least that what I took away from it. Maybe Wisksvt can chime in.