Ahh. Gotcha. Wasn't sure what you meant there. I was confused because I wouldn't buy a "new" vehicle that was already jacked up and repaired.
If the damage is excessive we will turn them into used cars.
Ahh. Gotcha. Wasn't sure what you meant there. I was confused because I wouldn't buy a "new" vehicle that was already jacked up and repaired.
I have been a porter at 2 collision shops and a large dealership and not one ever charged any employee for damages. This is why businesses have insurance and when working around cars accidents are bound to happen and it is total BS to charge an employee for minor accidents that happen. If its a total then thats a differetn boat
.Right, the business should just eat the damages. I mean it's their fault for letting people drive.
.
Its
The cost of doing business. That needs company vehicles . They are general operating cost
.
Its
The cost of doing business. That needs company vehicles . They are general operating cost
No but if you have a company vehicle you have to estimate that you might have minor repairs to the vehicle. Why pay for insurance if your going to force the employee to pay.
Every place i ever worked if a tech or porter damaged a bumper,light or any other part of the vehicle it was covered
No but if you have a company vehicle you have to estimate that you might have minor repairs to the vehicle. Why pay for insurance if your going to force the employee to pay.
Every place i ever worked if a tech or porter damaged a bumper,light or any other part of the vehicle it was covered
Just playing devils advocate here but yes it is their fault if they let some dumb kid take a car out and crash it. Do you think a judge would find for you guys if you tried to sue some fuckhead kid for your deductible? I'm being serious. Even though I feel the kid should be responsible, I wonder if he could be held responsible? In 20 years of working in the auto repair industry I've never heard of anyone being held responsible for damage. And I've seen some pretty stupid and negligent shit that should have resulted in a beating long before a payment!! :lol:Right, the business should just eat the damages. I mean it's their fault for letting people drive.
You put. Periods in odd. Places.Everytime a car was damaged it was usually cause of a misjudgement in the shop well moving vehicles. It was not like they were damaged during joy riding. If you have ever been in a collision shop they are often very tight with lots of equipment around and minor accidents happen. I have yet to run. Into one of the accidents being from a person not being responsible. They were all true accidents, i'm not saying this is. The norm but im just voicing my opinion on this situation.
Everytime a car was damaged it was usually cause of a misjudgement in the shop well moving vehicles. It was not like they were damaged during joy riding. If you have ever been in a collision shop they are often very tight with lots of equipment around and minor accidents happen. I have yet to run. Into one of the accidents being from a person not being responsible. They were all true accidents, i'm not saying this is. The norm but im just voicing my opinion on this situation.
Just playing devils advocate here but yes it is their fault if they let some dumb kid take a car out and crash it. Do you think a judge would find for you guys if you tried to sue some fuckhead kid for your deductible? I'm being serious. Even though I feel the kid should be responsible, I wonder if he could be held responsible? In 20 years of working in the auto repair industry I've never heard of anyone being held responsible for damage. And I've seen some pretty stupid and negligent shit that should have resulted in a beating long before a payment!! :lol:
when working around cars accidents are bound to happen and it is total BS to charge an employee for minor accidents that happen.
Right, the business should just eat the damages.
.
Its
The cost of doing business.
So the employee should have no responsibilty for his/her actions?
:roll: The cost of doing business is having someone wreck a car? Really? How many companies do you own?
No but if you have a company vehicle you have to estimate that you might have minor repairs to the vehicle. Why pay for insurance if your going to force the employee to pay.
Every place i ever worked if a tech or porter damaged a bumper,light or any other part of the vehicle it was covered
Those business owners are crazy. What reason does the employee have to respect or care for a customers car. If they damage your car they dont care.
Do you know how insurance companies work?
Please don't apply at any of our dealerships.
Not only kids crash cars. We have had techs, sales people, managers, etc. crash cars before.
In the 20 of working in the dealership I've seen plenty of people pay for damages................including me. From the time I was 18 to almost 20, I paid $73.67 a week for wrecking a T-bird. My Uncle told me it was either pay it or never work here again. It was a tough lesson, but I paid the money.
We have never had to go to court, so I don't know.
Yup, I agreed with you...and I wouldn't if I knew if I made a mistake I would have to pay. No way to run a business IMO.
Same thing here.If the damage is excessive we will turn them into used cars.