beau
Club Member
Shoot the owner, you can't blame a dog for how it is raised.
My 5yr old got attact by 2 dogs!!
- Thread starter RobbVII
- Start date
Shoot the owner, you can't blame a dog for how it is raised.
BigWheelinBubba
Club Member
Still not the dogs fault. You give me a week with either of those dogs and i guarantee you neither of them would ever be aggressive again.
orangejuiced86
Club Member
OK, dog whisperer, lol
Eitherway I dont own nor ever will own a dog, but if i did and it got out and bit a child it would be put down instantly.
IM outta this thread.
/OJ
Eitherway I dont own nor ever will own a dog, but if i did and it got out and bit a child it would be put down instantly.
IM outta this thread.
/OJ
beau
Club Member
BigWheelinBubba
Club Member
Good thing you don't own dogs. In by no way am i trying to justify what happened to this poor little girl, but if you had a dog and it got out and bit someone's kid it would be your responsibility. You should shoot yourself for not raising it right and letting it get out in the first place.
G
Goin' on Green
Guest
Every now and then my dog gets out...someone leaves the door open, or the gate, or we are unpacking groceries and he finds a way....he's just a little fat fella though. The worst thing he would do is hump your leg...he's a perv. I get both sides though of wanting to harm her dog or her for that matter. In THIS case, I'm all for shooting the lady, and biting the dogs back.
:icon_mrgr
mdhmi
Club Member
I wasn't really trying to make a point, I was simply asking a question so I could better understand what happened.
Obviously a five year old sustaining a dog bite is a traumatizing event, that's fairly obvious and doesn't need to be restated fifty times..
See above - I asked simply to better understand what happened. But thanks, for assuming the worst.
Since you bring it up, yeah - I do think it's a bit suspect that a parent would leave their five year old child in the care of a fourteen year old while they're out of town.
Out for dinner I could understand, but out of town? As I said earlier, I wasn't trying to commentate on the op's childrearing judgment.
At any rate, of course I feel bad for anyone who is attacked by a dog. I think all of this "you should sue em" talk is a bit premature considering how incomprehensible the original post was it’s difficult to determine what even happened.
Dr. Teeth
Club Member
orangejuiced86
Club Member
This statement is arrogant to the fullest degree.
How can you be so sure a dog will never bite?? You make it sign a "Doggy no bite contract"??
Dr. Teeth
Club Member
I wasn't really trying to make a point, I was simply asking a question so I could better understand what happened.
Obviously a five year old sustaining a dog bite is a traumatizing event, that's fairly obvious and doesn't need to be restated fifty times..
See above - I asked simply to better understand what happened. But thanks, for assuming the worst.
Since you bring it up, yeah - I do think it's a bit suspect that a parent would leave their five year old child in the care of a fourteen year old while they're out of town.
Out for dinner I could understand, but out of town? As I said earlier, I wasn't trying to commentate on the op's childrearing judgment.
At any rate, of course I feel bad for anyone who is attacked by a dog. I think all of this "you should sue em" talk is a bit premature considering how incomprehensible the original post was it’s difficult to determine what even happened.
A dog bit a 5 year old child, that's what happened, and that's all you need to know. It's the dog-owners responsibility regardless of whether or not the parent was out to dinner or on the moon. The multiple wounds pictured on that child (not the scrapes but the bite marks) indicate that she was not snapped at, she was attacked by the dog and the reason is insignificant. The owner is at fault and negligent and the incident is absolutely inexcusable.
orangejuiced86
Club Member
In all reality, the dogs should be put down and that owner should never be allowed to own or raise another dog. Just my opinion, I am free to voice that here correct?? If not bite me, lol
Crazzy_Al
Mr. Hair Gel Overgeller
Agreed.
orangejuiced86
Club Member
Dude, this is motown muscle where everyone is perfect, and everyone knows everything!
Basically you have dog owners who dont have kids and you have parents who dont own dogs in this thread. You have emotion coming from both ends which is understandable. Ther perfect end to this situation in my opinion would be to put the dogs down and ban the owners from ever owning another dog. Simple as that. To honestly say these dogs could/would never bite again is an impossible statement to back up IMO.
mdhmi
Club Member
That's all I would need to know if I didn't care to understand what happened, how it happened, and how potentially it could have been avoided. :cheers:
BigWheelinBubba
Club Member
I know dogs, you know kids. Can you be sure one of your kids isn't going to be a serial killer when they grow up? :dontknow: As a parent doing things right i'm sure your answer will be "yes"
orangejuiced86
Club Member
I know dogs, you know kids. Can you be sure one of your kids isn't going to be a serial killer when they grow up? :dontknow: As a parent doing things right i'm sure your answer will be "yes"
I aint got a clue on that one. All 3 of my boys might grow up and kill half the world. But I can say that IF they did that I would be the first one to say "Time to put them down". Things like that just cant be fixed IMO.
G