Or you could simply interpret what has been stated here by several others as answering the op’s question as; yes, you are correct, with a 347 and p heads dependent upon cam/compression and other factors, you would most likely end up around the 300 watermark without a hassle. But that’s just using the “backwoods” air dyno of course :wink:
The catch is, the p’s on the stroker are going to be a BIG choke point, it should make a good amount of torque but will lack the ability to make a reasonable amount of HP for the c.i and it’s damn sure not going to be doing it at high rpms which sounds like he’s fine with for the intended purpose. I’ve looked into this myself and decided it’s just not worth strapping those little heads onto a 347, but he DID say he wanted good manners and it wasn’t a “race car” Have I actually done it myself? Nope! Have you built up one of these 302 based motors that performs like it can’t possibly says you? I’m guessing you must have tried hence the bitterness and lack of ability to accept what people that HAVE accomplished it are saying.
As far as all the dumb, you got me, and I’m sure everyone else that “says” it can be done. Mine is really a 310c.i. Ed Curtis prepped s/b, p-heads, and cam that I enjoy driving 85 miles a day just so I can throw all the cash away and only go 12s! RIGHT. Just like the moon landing was filmed in a Hollywood Basement, all of my youtube vids are REALLY my 175rwhp stock 86 engine running low to mid 12’s. Honestly??
I bet my Vortec headed sbc 350 can’t run in the 12’s in a 3400lb turd either since all I’ve done is “heads, cam, and intake” for 150HP right?
Hijack over, armed and ready for the retort
Was this all worth my wasted time? Hmm, nope. Have a good one!