>>>>ANSWERS TO THE VANDALIZED COBALT<<<<<<<

Isn't still all hearsay???? You don't have any proof as to who did it. Unless the kids admit it to the police you may still have problems proving who did it. It will be your moms word against theirs. As long as the keep denying it to the police and in court you might not get anything. It's not like the police will spend any time actually investigating it.

I hope I'm wrong, either way good luck.
 
Yeah it's nothing untill one of them gives it up to the cops or they catch them in front of your house with speculation of the previous incident. The phone record without any taped conversation doesn't show anything. If you have any future conversations tape them, that way if he admits it you have him on tape.
I hope one of them snitches, good luck.
 
Those pussies will throw eachother to the wolves in no time...put 'em in an interrogation room for 30 seconds and they'll be wetting themselves...good game!
 
Exception to hearsay is party admission.

The defendant said it, it's not hearsay.

Rule 801 Hearsay;Definitions
The following definitions apply under this article:
Michigan Rules of Evidence Last Updated 6/23/2006ഊ(a)Statement.A "statement"is (1)an oral or written assertion or
(2)nonverbal
conduct of a person,if it is intended by the person as an assertion.
(b)Declarant.A "declarant"is a person who makes a statement.

(c)Hearsay."Hearsay"is a statement,other than the one made by the declarant
while testifying at the trial or hearing,offered in evidence to prove the truth of the
matter asserted.

(d)Statements which are not hearsay.A statement is not hearsay if –
(1)Prior statement of witness.The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and
is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement,and the statement is

(A)inconsistent with the declarant's testimony,and was given under oath
subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial,hearing,or other proceeding,or in a
deposition,or
(B)consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to
rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or
improper influence or motive,or
(C)one of identification of a person made after
perceiving the person;or

(2)Admission by party-opponent.The statement is offered against a party and
is
(A)the party's own statement,in either an individual or a representative
capacity,except statements made in connection with a guilty plea to a
misdemeanor motor vehicle violation or an admission of responsibility for a civil
infraction under laws pertaining to motor vehicles,or
(B)a statement of which
the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth,or
(C)a statement
by a person authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the
subject,or
(D)a statement by the party's agent or servant concerning a matter
within the scope of the agency or employment,made during the existence of
the relationship,or
(E)a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the
course and in furtherance of the conspiracy on independent proof of the
conspiracy.
 
Good to hear that you found out who did it. Now it's time to do something about it and put the punk ass kids away.

Good Luckk!
 
easy2c said:
Pussy ass mofo's. I hate these fake ghetto ass people. would love to cleanse our society of these non-contributing assclowns. The world would be better without them.
Click to expand...

ha! thats 99% of the rich loser kids in SE michigan. :lol: i fucking hate rich kids.
 
At least you got the bottom of it. Threatening shit over the phone, let alone to a woman (your mom) what tough guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top