sbf trick flow to victor 5.0 intake problem

So putting my 306 together and started looking at the heads and intake. Intake is setup for a 1262 gasket and heads are 1250 gasket size which is slightly smaller. So do I open up the heads slightly or do I go with a trick flow intake and sell the victor?
 
The Victor 5.0 is a high rpm intake.... for a N/A 306 you would probably have better results from a trickflow or performer rpm, but a boosted application the Victor 5.0 is probably the best

Super Intake Shootout
GT-40 vs. TFS R
A number of things are obvious from this graph. The first thing is that the TFS R made a great deal more power than the same motor equipped with a GT-40. Though 25 extra horsepower is nothing to sneeze at, the extra power was only available after 5500 rpm. Up to 5550 rpm, the modified GT-40 showed some pretty impressive gains from 3300 rpm all the way to 5550 rpm. Time and time again, the GT-40 continues to impress, though the TFS R intake clearly made more top-end power on this high-revving 347.

GT-40 Vs. Holley Systemax II
The Holley SysteMax bested the GT-40 by 5250 rpm, much earlier than the TFS R intake. Though the Holley offered a better torque curve, the additional torque production did not cost any top-end power. The Holley was only down by 1 hp compared to the TFS R intake. Like the TFS R, the Holley was down substantially to the GT-40 in the low and mid-range.

347 Test Motor Specs
•Block - 2-bolt 5.0
•Crank - Cast 3.40-inch 347-Coast High Performance
•Rods - 5.40-in. Steel H-Beam- (CHP)
•Pistons - Forged 10.5:1 5.0 Probe (11.5:1 with milled heads)
•Cam - XE 292R (Comp Cams)
•Lift - .621 in, .627 ex (.016, .018 lash)
•Duration - 254 in, 260 ex
•Lobe Center - 110
•Heads - AFR 185 (CNC ported & milled)
•Valves - 2.02-in, 1.60-ex
•Rockers - Comp Cams 1.6 ratio roller
•Intake - GT-40
•Throttle Body - 70 mm Accufab MAF - 77mm ProM (36 lb. calibration)
•Computer - EEC IV plus Ford Racing Extender
•Injectors - 36 lbs.-hr.
•Ignition - MSDHeaders - 13/4-inch full length Hooker
•Water Pump - Electric CSI
•Timing - 34* Total


TEST 1 -- GT-40 Intake-Baseline
•Peak Power Numbers: GT-40 Intake CHP 347-AFR heads & XE292R cam
•Peak Horsepower-GT-40 450 hp @ 6600 rpm
•Peak Torque-GT-40 447 lbs.-ft. @ 4700 rpm





Engine GT-40

RPM HP HP Tq Tq

3000 NA NA/td>

3200 NA NA

3400 263 406

3600 289 421

3800 314 434

4000 334 438

4200 351 439

4400 370 442

4600 388 444

4800 408 447

5000 424 445

5200 433 437

5400 438 427

5600 441 414

5800 438 396

6000 434 379

6200 437 371

6400 447 367

6600 450 358



TFS R INTake
Peak Power Numbers: GT-40 Intake vs. TFS RCHP 347-AFR heads & XE292R cam




Engine GT-40 Holley GT-40 Holley

RPM HP HP Tq Tq

3000 NA 201 NA 351

3200 NA 218 NA 358

3400 263 242 406 374

3600 289 268 421 391

3800 314 288 434 399

4000 334 307 438 403

4200 351 330 439 412

4400 370 351 442 419

4600 389 368 444 420

4800 408 384 447 420

5000 424 400 445 420

5200 433 416 437 420

5400 439 430 427 418

5600 441 446 414 418

5800 438 458 396 414

6000 434 466 379 408

6200 437 472 371 400

6400 447 475 367 390

6600 450 470 358 374



Peak Horsepower -- GT-40 450 hp @ 6600 rpm * Peak Horsepower -- TFS R 475 hp @ 6500 rpm * Peak Torque -- GT-40 447 lbs.-ft. @ 4700 rpm * Peak Torque -- TFS R 422 lbs.-ft. @ 5100 rpm

GT-40 vs. Edelbrock Victor 5.0
The graph comparison between the Edelbrock Victor 5.0 and the GT-40 looks a lot like the comparison between the TFS R and the GT-40. In fact, with the exception of the extra power produced by the Victor 5.0 available from 6400 rpm to 6700 rpm, the TFS R and Edelbrock traded blows all the way up the power band. Like the TFS R intake , the Victor 5.0 lost power compared to the GT-40 all the way up to 5550 rpm. At that point, the Edelbrock stormed away in terms of power production.

TFS R vs. Holley
Note the significant humps in the torque curve offered by the Holley manifold. The Holley bested the TFS intake all the way up to 6300 rpm, where the TFS manifold took the power lead by the smallest of margins.

Victor 5.0 vs. Holley
The story was repeated in a comparison between the Holley and the Edelbrock, though the differential was not quite as dramatic as with the TFS manifold. The Holley offered more power and torque throughout the range up to 6100 rpm, where the Edelbrock turned the tables to the tune of 13 hp at 6600 rpm. It is possible that the Edelbrock intake requires an even wilder motor combination to fully realize its potential.

Holley SysteMax II
•Peak Power Numbers: GT-40 Intake vs. Holley SysteMax II
•CHP 347-AFR heads & XE292R cam
•Peak Horsepower-GT-40 450 hp @ 6600 rpm
•Peak Horsepower-Holley 474 hp @ 6300 rpm
•Peak Torque-GT-40 447 lbs.-ft. @ 4700 rpm
•Peak Torque-Holley 436 lbs.-ft. @ 5300 rpm





Engine GT-40 Holley GT-40 Holley

RPM HP HP Tq Tq

3000 NA NA NA NA

3200 NA 217 NA 356

3400 263 247 406 382

3600 289 269 421 393

3800 314 293 434 404

4000 334 319 438 419

4200 351 342 439 428

4400 370 354 442 422

4600 389 368 444 421

4800 408 389 447 425

5000 424 410 445 431

5200 433 431 437 436

5400 439 445 427 433

5600 441 457 414 428

5800 438 466 396 422

6000 434 469 379 411

6200 437 472 371 399

6400 447 473 367 388

6600 450 468 358 372



EDELBROCK victor 5.0

The Edelbrock Victor 5.0 posted the highest peak horsepower numbers, generating 481 hp at 6600 rpm. The 426 lbs.-ft. placed it above the TFS R but below the Holley in terms of maximum torque output.

•CHP 347-AFR heads & XE292R cam
•Peak Horsepower-GT-40 450 hp @ 6600 rpm
•Peak Horsepower-Victor 5.0 481 hp @ 6600 rpm
•Peak Torque-GT-40 447 lbs.-ft. @ 4700 rpm
•Peak Torque-Victor 5.0 426 lbs.-ft. @ 4900 rpm





Engine GT-40 Victor GT-40 Victor

RPM HP HP Tq Tq

3000 NA 192 NA 336

3200 NA 209 NA 342

3400 263 238 406 367

3600 289 264 421 385

3800 314 288 434 397

4000 334 311 338 408

4200 351 327 439 409

4400 370 345 442 411

4600 389 366 444 417

4800 408 386 447 422

5000 424 404 445 424

5200 433 419 437 423

5400 439 433 427 421

5600 441 444 414 416

5800 438 456 396 413

6000 434 464 379 407

6200 437 474 371 401

6400 447 478 367 392

6600 450 481 358 382
 
Last edited:
I was kinda leaning toward the Victor 5.0 and ditching my BBK SSI intake when I decide to go Turbo. Even though it looks cool its a PITA to work on
 
Back
Top