I find your comment kind of amusing seeing how GM and the Japs think there is a market for them.I owned/leased 6-7 of them. Great trucks, just no market for them anymore.
The problem is that they tried to make them like a small fullsize truck. Instead, they should have targeted them as cheap vehicles that met crash test standards.
In ~1999 you could lease a S10 2.2/5 speed with no radio for like $80/month. The truck was like $8k or something. If they made cheap compact trucks they would sell like hotcakes. Instead, you have $23,000 Colorados with I5s and Rangers with the worst V6 on Earth.
Instead, you have $23,000 Colorados with I5s and Rangers with the worst V6 on Earth.
The 4.0 was only the worst V6 because of the gas mileage, however it was probably the most reliable V6 in the market.
The sticker on my loaded FX4 was $28K, which is stupid.
--Joe
I saw an "M" plate "Ranger" the other day going down 94 in Dearborn. Looked bigger, 4 doors, similar to the Explorer Sport Track. Maybe the "Ranger" name will be coming back sometime in the near future?
I find your comment kind of amusing seeing how GM and the Japs think there is a market for them.
In reply to 91trunk. I find it amusing because that is how I feel. I do understand how dealers try to extract the maximum amount of money from a customer. They will actively try to sway someone away from the smaller trucks to point them to the cash cow full sized truck. I am a Ford retiree who never owned anything but a Ford product and as much as this hurts to say, I will be shopping the competition when it's time to replace our 05 Ranger Edge.