Chevy no longer availabe in Europe

Stalker

I removed my teeth on purpose....if you catch my d
http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20131205&id=17166531&ocid=ansmony11

FRANKFURT/DETROIT, Dec 5 (Reuters) - In a strategic about-face, General Motors will drop the Chevrolet brand in Europe by the end of 2015 after it failed to build significant market share, and the company will focus instead on its Opel and Vauxhall lines to try to return to profitability there.
The world's second-biggest carmaker behind Japan's Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday that the decision would result in one-time charges of up to $1 billion, but it should lead to production, marketing and distribution savings.
GM shares were up 1.1 percent at $39.13 in afternoon New York Stock Exchange trading.
Reintroduced in Europe in 2005, Chevrolets were to compete at the budget end of the market with the likes of South Korea's Hyundai, Volkswagen's Skoda and Renault's Dacia while turning GM's mainstream nameplate into a global brand.
But the Chevy brand, by far GM's biggest in its home U.S. market, failed to make much headway in Europe as its largely South Korean-made cars struggled against rivals, some of which are customized for European markets.
Hurt also by a brutal downturn in European demand, Chevrolet responded by slashing prices and introducing more high-end models. But that pitted it against Opel and Vauxhall, and Chevy's sales showed little progress at about 200,000 cars a year.
"Getting rid of Chevy seems to be a little about-face for them," said Scott Schermerhorn, managing principal and chief investment officer with Granite Investment Advisors, whose largest investment position is in GM stock.
"They talked about a global brand, which is led by Chevy," he added. "However, given the state of the market, focusing on the brands that sell well and no longer trying to swim upstream in growing the Chevy brand over there makes sense."
While RBC Capital Markets analyst Joseph Spak described the decision as "flip-flopping" that nonetheless made sense, one investment banker said it was about time GM threw its support completely behind Opel, given the brand's storied heritage.
"It's been a long time and a waste of a lot of money to eventually come to the right decision," said the banker, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic.
GM almost sold Opel in 2009 before deciding the 151-year-old brand was too important to its business.
NordLB analyst Frank Schwope said the decision to drop the Chevy brand was great for Opel and likely to ease some of the pressure on a European market suffering from overcapacity.
"GM hopes Chevy customers will now migrate to Opel," he said. But he raised the possibility that they might instead buy other value brands like Dacia and Hyundai.
GM's decision will also be felt in South Korea, where the company produces most of the Chevrolet vehicles sold in Europe. Those exports reached 186,000 in 2012.
"We will phase out exports to Europe by the end of 2015," GM Korea spokesman Park Hae-ho said. "We will discuss with the union how to enhance the operating efficiency of our plants."
GM said it would honor its contracts with its 1,900 Chevy dealers in Europe, but declined to provide other details. More than half of its Chevy dealers in Western and Eastern Europe also sell Opel vehicles.

CONFIDENCE IN OPEL
GM has made a turnaround of its European business a top priority after racking up some $18 billion in losses over the past 12 years, and it is investing billions more despite calls from Morgan Stanley to sell Opel and Vauxhall at virtually any cost.
In April, GM pledged to invest 4 billion euros ($5.2 billion) in money-losing Opel by the end of 2016 to support new model launches, renewing a commitment to its struggling European brand.
By 2016, GM's investment will replace 80 percent of the brand's engine portfolio with new fuel-efficient versions.
"Chevrolet's business results in Europe were unacceptable," GM Vice Chairman Stephen Girsky said in a telephone interview. "It's a 1 percent share company. Meanwhile, we are gaining more and more confidence with Opel and Vauxhall."
Girsky declined to say how much GM would save, but said some of the savings would accrue in Europe and some in other parts of the world. He said the company's target to break even financially in Europe by mid-decade had not changed with the announcement.
Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said the time line to break-even could be accelerated to late next year.
"We get more bang for our buck spending the money in Opel and redirecting the resources to Chevrolet in other parts of the world," Girsky said, adding that Chevy remains a global brand even if it is a small player in Europe.
Abandoning Chevy in Europe shows that GM, unlike Volkswagen, is unable to manage several brands there, NordLB's Schwope said.
Stifel Nicolaus analyst James Albertine said the streamlined approach in Europe would eliminate cannibalization across the company's brands, help GM fine-tune advertising spending in the region and save money in its supply chain, but it still had a way to go to end losses there.
"Relative to peer Ford, we think GM has further to climb as it relates to EU profitability, but this is clearly a step in the right direction," he said.
As part of its efforts to push Chevy globally, GM signed a $559 million, seven-year sponsorship deal with English soccer champions Manchester United in July 2012, which is due to put the Chevy brand on the club's famous red shirts in 2014-2015.
Girsky said that deal remains unaffected. "We always looked at Man U as a global deal," he said. "They're exposed around the world, and Chevrolet will be exposed around the world."
GM said the decision to drop the Chevy line in Europe would result in net special charges of $700 million to $1 billion, primarily in this quarter but continuing in the first half of 2014.

Of that amount, $300 million will be noncash expenses. The charges also include asset impairments, dealer restructuring and severance-related costs.
GM said it also expected to incur restructuring costs that will not be treated as special charges, but would affect earnings at its international operations in 2014.
Dropping the Chevy brand in Europe was not influenced by a partnership GM has with French carmaker PSA Peugeot, Girsky said.
GM, the No. 1 U.S. carmaker, took a 7 percent stake in Peugeot after the companies announced what was billed as a broad-based alliance in February 2012, promising eventual savings of $1 billion each. But that was followed by unsuccessful talks on a deeper combination and a steady scaling back of plans.
GM also said it was completing expansion plans in Europe for its Cadillac luxury line, which has been more a niche brand in the region. The company said it would expand its distribution network for the brand over the next three years as it prepares to introduce more products.
 
Not really suprising. It's like the Asia markets, everything is a buick over there. Chevy just doesn't sell.
 
its interesting though, because theyre the exact same cars. if they dont sell with a chevy badge, put an opel badge on and sell the car
 
Yep, they don't care for American cars...they are the same yes, but no...
Same with Cadillac and targeting BMW. Even if the Cadillac is a nice car here, its not a BMW, and its not European, it will flop there.
 
They buy the things they manufacture. I have quite a few friends over there (Germany), and a lot of this is what we talk about since we are in this industry.
You could say "keep it in the family".
Not like here where people work for a company and buy imported stuff. Yes its very difficult here now to buy American only, but its our own fault that things got this far out of hand.
 
Yep, they don't care for American cars...they are the same yes, but no...

Not exactly.

You get some of that sentiment but it's not overwhelming. Volkswagen is the largest seller in Europe and that has less to do with some pure love of Volkswagen as opposed to Volkswagen's oft-stated pursuit of becoming the world's largest car maker. After that? For any of their babble about not liking American cars, the number two brand in Europe is Ford.

The French and Italians drive the largely crappy cars they produce because their governments are committed to keeping them in business forever, though I guess you can make that case for us now too. Try closing an outdated useless car factory in France.

Trying to sell Chevy in Europe was just a dumb idea. Vauxhall/Opel is enough of a hassle. Not necessary to introduce another brand in the world's oldest and impossible-to-profit in consumer market.
 
^ Ford of Europe is a European company as far as they are concerned. Just like Ford of Australia - it's a domestic company to the locals.

Yep, they don't care for American cars...they are the same yes, but no...
Same with Cadillac and targeting BMW. Even if the Cadillac is a nice car here, its not a BMW, and its not European, it will flop there.

Europeans have the mindset that American cars are big, expensive (for what you get), inefficient and cheaply made.
And no, Cadillac isn't a nicer car here, there, or anywhere. <-- That one's my opinion. :D
 
Last edited:
Perhaps not the name itself, however, since '67 Ford has been catering to the European market in a huge way. There is an established consumer relationship with the brand. Despite being an American I realize that Ford of Europe is a huge entity. I know very little about GM's footings in Europe, aside from the Vauxhall and Opel brands (plus any GM Saabs). If they were selling vehicles catering to US consumers, I can see how there could be potential issues - size, efficiency, engine options, insurance costs, etc. I certainly don't know the actual reasons, and I'm certainly no expert. But that's my personal thoughts. I'm sure I don't have it 100%, but I hope there's a point to be seen, lol.
 
I would say Ford is pretty good about separating the Euro cars from the American counterparts. They are starting to share more and more of the tech and engineering these past 5 years or so. GM however, loves to rebadge crap and try to sell it. It works both ways tho. Look at the Caddy Catera.... fucking flop. Just getting in that car you can tell it was not designed for the US market, the controls and interior is "different," the different that you feel when you just sit in an older Benz/BMW/Volvo/etc etc etc. So dont forget the other end of that, When they offer "American-ized" cars its harder for the buyers to get into something different for the same price as something they are used to and trust
 
Back
Top